City Guides (Kyoto, Osaka, Hiroshima, Onomichi) in Japan: what actually matters to know
Short answer
Roppongi is superior for central sightseeing and walkability, while Hiroshima offers better logistical connections for travelers than Onomichi. For travel between Osaka and Kyoto, local trains are significantly more cost-effective than taxis, and the first train from Namba effectively supports early morning departures from KIX.
From real experience
When choosing between Roppongi and Chuo City in Tokyo: Roppongi offers better walkability, proximity to attractions like Roppongi Hills (with the spider sculpture), and easier access to Ueno museums and teamLab Borderless.
Chuo City is closer to the river, but Roppongi provides a more central base for general sightseeing and day trips.
✓ 1 report from chats
Choosing between Hiroshima and Onomichi for a 3-night stay during a cycling trip (including Miyajima and Hiroshima): Onomichi offers more scenic cycling potential but has less convenient Shinkansen access.
Hiroshima provides better logistical connections. Verify if Onomichi is covered by the chosen Kansai Pass.
✓ 1 report from chats
For visitors to Japan, Kyoto is recommended for historical sites and atmosphere, best visited early morning.
Osaka is preferred for nightlife, modern shopping, and as a central hub for day trips to Nara, Kyoto, and Kobe.
✓ 1 report from chats
If departing from Kansai International Airport (KIX) at 9:08 AM, the first train from Namba around 5:15 AM is sufficient.
It arrives in Osaka around 6:00 AM, providing ample time and negating the need for a taxi.
✓ 1 report from chats
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of train travel versus taxi for transportation between Osaka and Kyoto.
Taxi fares are estimated to be significantly higher (around 20,000-25,000 JPY) compared to local trains.